I read Rethinking Rubrics in Writing Assessment this week during the reading time. I have had doubts about rubrics for a long time and was gratified to realize that I am not alone in my doubts. I know that rubrics are a good way to help students understand the things a teacher is looking for, but they are also very limiting in how teachers can score or evaluate student writing. I also believe that rubrics cause students to “write to the rubric” without trying their best. I don’t know of any other way to make assessment of writing easier. I really think writing assessment involves a great deal of reading, commenting, conferencing, and support for students if improvement is to happen. There’s no substitute for hard work on the part of students and teachers.
Sun Belt Book Groups
Writing Project Websites
Topics of Discussion
- 1 (8)
- ELA and Technology (1)
- Success in School (2)
- Sun Belt stories (1)
- Teaching Writing (3)
- Welcome (2)
The TIW we had today, responding to writing, was very helpful in exploring assessing writing. I think that conferencing sessions are truly valuable forms of feedback. Rubrics – that love/hate relationship continues. Your point about students “writing to the rubric” is accurate. Kind of reminds you of “teaching to the test”, doesn’t it? Removes all authenticity, for sure. Thanks for the post!